Hate Speech – Yeniakit Publisher

Hate Speech Incident Report
1

Identification

Date

02/05/2026

Location

Online · Samsun, Turkey

Platform

Newspaper (Online, Printed) | Yeni Akit

2

Perpetrator

Name

Yeniakit Publisher

Profession

Private Institution

Position

According to a report prepared by the Hrant Dink Foundation, it is the national newspaper in Türkiye where hate speech is most frequently encountered.

Organization

Yeni Akit is said to be linked to islamism, pan-Islamism, fundamentalism, reactionism, erdoğanism, social conservatism, crypto-fascism, homophobia, anti-feminism, anti-semitism, anti-communism

3

Target Group

Targeted Group

Gülen Movement

Description

The Hizmet (Gülen) Movement is a civil society movement that operates in the fields of education, dialogue, and humanitarian aid, rejects violence, and is based on voluntary participation. The movement places universal values such as respect for human rights, the rule of law, pluralism, and peaceful coexistence at its core, and regards religious, cultural, and social diversity as a source of richness.

Targeted Individuals (If any)

Two unnamed individuals

4

Content of the Incident

Summary

A news report published by Yeni Akit on February 5, 2026, stated that two individuals with finalized prison sentences for membership in “FETÖ” were apprehended in the Çarşamba and Bafra districts of Samsun and sent to prison. The report labeled the individuals as “FETÖ members” and used the phrase “delivered to where they belong.

Direct Quotation
TR: “2 FETÖ’cü daha ait oldukları yere [cezaevi] teslim edildi” EN: “2 more FETÖ members have been handed over to where they belong [prison].”
5

Why This Case Qualifies as Hate Speech?

Context Description

The term ‘FETÖ’ is a politically charged label that was produced and widely disseminated through state discourse in Türkiye after 2016, without a clearly defined legal basis. By grouping all individuals and entities associated with the Gülen Movement under a single, homogeneous category of ‘terrorism,” the term eliminates the principle of individual criminal responsibility and creates a framework of collective guilt. From the perspective of international human rights law, the criminalization of a community on the basis of alleged ideological or religious affiliation, without individualized judicial determination, is incompatible with the presumption of innocence, freedom of expression, and the prohibition of discrimination. In this context, the term ‘FETÖ’ functions not merely as a descriptive label, but as a stigmatizing and targeting form of rhetoric. The systematic use of the term in media, political, and public discourse contributes to portraying individuals associated with the Gülen Movement as security threats, facilitates their dehumanization, and exposes them to social hostility. For these reasons, when used irrespective of context, the term ‘FETÖ’ constitutes a slur that meets the criteria of hate speech and discriminatory language.

Contextual Analysis

The headline’s phrasing, particularly “ait oldukları yere teslim edildi” (“delivered to where they belong”), carries an exclusionary connotation implying that imprisonment is the natural or appropriate place for individuals labeled as “FETÖ’cü.” The use of the suffix “-cü” transforms the politically charged label into an identity marker, reinforcing collective association with terrorism rather than focusing on individualized judicial responsibility. Although reporting on finalized convictions falls within the protection of Article 19 of the ICCPR and Article 10 of the ECHR, the language used goes beyond neutral reporting by framing the individuals as inherently belonging in prison due to their alleged ideological affiliation. Under Article 20(2) of the ICCPR, speech that advocates hatred constituting incitement to discrimination or hostility must be prohibited. While the article does not explicitly call for violence, the stigmatizing and essentializing terminology contributes to collective criminalization and exclusion.

6

Classification

Targeted Characteristic

Ideological views

Hate Speech Types
Stereotyping

true

Insult

false

Dehumanization

false

Call For Violence

false

Discriminatory Policy

true

7

Impact Assessment

Stigmatization

true

Normalization

true

Social Exclusion

false

Harassment Risk

false

Chilling Effect

false

Hostile Environment

true

Intergenerational Harm

false